Showing posts with label would. Show all posts
Showing posts with label would. Show all posts

Monday, 29 July 2013

'Star Wars: Episode VII' Will Be More 'Empire Strikes Back' Than 'Attack Of The Clones'

/uri/mgid:uma:content:mtv.com:1711405?width=281&height=211
'Star Wars: Episode VII' Will Be More 'Empire Strikes Back' Than 'Attack Of The Clones'
When Lucasfilm and Disney announced that they would team up to bring a new trilogy of "Star Wars" movie to the screen, what got the most hardcore fans excited wasn't the idea of seeing new films along the lines of "Attack of the Clones." The promise of more "Star Wars" movies — especially if they continue the story of Luke, Han, and Leia — came with the hope that things might go back to how they used to be, back when Yoda was a puppet and nobody knew what a midi-chlorian is. So it's hard not to get excited when Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy speaks at "Star Wars Celebration Europe" (via IGN) and says something like, "The story and characters are all we're talking about right now. We have an amazing team at ILM, who can create fantastic effects, but if we don't have a great story and characters, the effects mean nothing." Kennedy — who's splitting her time between Lucasfilm and Bad Robot to shape up the script — implied that the new trilogy will hew closer to the original three films. "I do think making huge popular culture — and I've had the good fortune to be a part of a lot it — is really hard to do and get right," Kennedy continued. "And if you don't spend the time you need on developing characters, and finding stories, complicated stories, the audience gets tired because they think they're seeing the same thing again and again." Harrison Ford Knows J.J. Abrams Can Handle 'Star Wars' Back in February, "Empire Strikes Back" and "Episode VII" script consultant Lawrence Kasdan told the LA Times that he saw the new trilogy and the intermediate spin-offs as a chance to go back to the character-centric style of episodes four through six. "I'm trying to start fresh. There are certain pleasures that we think the saga can bring to people that they've been missing, and we're hoping to bring them that, and at the same time, have them feel that it's all new," he said. "The ones I worked on were a long time ago, and they had a slightly different feeling than the ones that followed. The first three, 'Star Wars,' 'Empire' and 'Return of the Jedi' are all sort of more about people than the ones that followed." This could all be dismissed as playing to older fans of the series, but with Kennedy meeting frequently with the writing team, including Kasdan, there certainly seems to be an agreement on what the new trilogy should be doing story-wise. Back at "Star Wars Celebration Europe," Kennedy explained that the script's harkening back to the original trilogy isn't the only similarity we'll see. She also elaborated on discussions she's had about using more practical special effects. "It's a conversation we're having all the time in the development of 'Episode VII.' Looking at all the 'Star Wars' movies and getting a feel for what even some of the early films did, combining real locations and special effects — that's something we're looking very seriously at....So we're going to find some very cool locations that we're going to use in support of Episode VII. And I think we're probably going to end up using every single tool in the toolbox to create the look of these movies." Warwick Davis, who was moderating the discussion, asked Kennedy to clarify what she meant by this, and she explained that she wants to use models, real droids, and "artwork that you actually can touch and feel." Are the original "Star Wars" fans getting the sequels they've always wanted? We'll see as the next few months play out and "Episode VII" goes into production, which is currently scheduled for early next year, ahead of a 2015 release date




news sours www.mtv.com

Sunday, 23 June 2013

Detroit bankruptcy endangers city's cultural gems

/apps/pbcsi.dll/storyimage/TL/20130623/news/306239957/AR/0/AR-306239957.jpg&MaxW=300
Detroit bankruptcy endangers city's cultural gems
AP) When Johnathan Shearrod gazes at Van Gogh's "Self Portrait," Bruegel the Elder's "Wedding Dance" or any of the other treasures at the Detroit Institute of Arts, he can't help but fear for their future. If Detroit falls into bankruptcy, those masterpieces and other prized artworks could go on the auction block to help satisfy the city's staggering debts. Though the auctions would raise much-needed cash, they would also strip the city of its cultural riches, including paintings by Rivera, Renoir and Matisse, and maybe even zoo animals and historic automobiles. "The art here is just as important as any of the structures connected to the auto industry," said Shearrod, a grant manager for a local nonprofit, during a recent visit to the museum. "The DIA is the spirit of Detroit." Other institutions owned by the city and potentially at risk include a black-culture museum, the historic Fort Wayne dating to the 1840s and the 985-acre Belle Isle park, which will probably be leased to the state. Just north of the city is the Detroit Zoo. Another source of potential auction pieces is the Detroit Historical Museum's collection of about 60 vehicles, including an 1870 Phaeton Carriage car, a 1911 Ford Model T and John Dodge's 1919 coupe. Shearrod said the DIA collection shouldn't be considered as an option. "Bidding the stuff off is completely ridiculous," he said. "There are better ways of dealing with Detroit's debt" than selling off an art collection piece by irreplaceable piece. But emergency manager Kevyn Orr, a bankruptcy expert hired by the state in March to steer Detroit away from insolvency, has made it clear that everything of value owned by the city could be up for grabs. A decision on whether to file for bankruptcy could come within weeks. In a letter to DIA officials, Orr gave notice that there are no sacred cows, even if bankruptcy means cutting the city's soul to save it. Others aren't so sure. The DIA doesn't believe the artwork can be sold to satisfy city debt and has an attorney looking into the issue. Michigan's attorney general has weighed in, too, releasing a formal opinion that the artwork is held by Detroit in charitable trust "for the people of Michigan." The state Senate passed a bill requiring the DIA to stick to a national code of museum ethics, which bars the sale of art to satisfy needs other than enhancing an institution's collection. Orr spokesman Bill Nowling said there is no intention to put a value on, or to sell, anything in the city-owned collection. "We were just giving them a heads-up," Nowling said. "We believe there is some exposure risk to the collection if we go into a bankruptcy that creditors could ask us to put some value on it." Some donated pieces have stipulations that prohibit them from being sold or transferred. However, others were bought decades ago with city money, said museum spokeswoman Pamela Marcil. Orr presented a plan earlier this month to creditors, asking some to take only 10 cents on the dollar on the debt the city owes. Others are being asked to take less. By July 1, Detroit's budget deficit could reach $380 million. Orr has said long-term debt could surpass $17 billion. If he doesn't get the concessions he seeks, Orr could move Detroit into a Chapter 9 bankruptcy. That would make it the largest U.S. city to do so. Should the city enter bankruptcy, everything, including the potential sale of artwork, "is probably on the table," said Ben Feder, a bankruptcy attorney with New York-based Kelley Drye & Warren. But "it would be the choice of the city to go that route. Without the consent of the city of Detroit, probably nothing" could be sold, Feder said. Selling or privatizing other Detroit assets, like its electric and water departments, makes more sense because they would bring in a steady flow of revenue, he added. The sale of a painting brings in a one-time sum. The museum won't put a price on any painting, but it's easy to imagine the work of famous artists fetching tens of millions of dollars. Van Gogh's "Portrait du Dr. Gachet" sold for more than $80 million at auction in 1990. A Henri Matisse bronze nude sold three years ago for more than $48 million. But what Detroit needs most is revenue to supplement its shrinking tax base caused by people and business fleeing the city. In the 1950s, Detroit had 1.8 million people. Its current population barely tops 700,000. Zoo board members have discussed the potential impact on the zoo. "The city essentially owns all of the assets other than vehicles," zoo Director Ron Kagan said. "Unlike the DIA, our works of art the animals really have no commercial value. I don't think we view this as an imminent threat." The zoo, the DIA and Detroit's other cultural gems have more value intact, Nowling said. "When you're talking about lowering a $15 billion debt load, there is not a big market for giraffes," he said. "We need to come up with a plan to protect as much of our assets as possible because we need a viable city going forward." The DIA is in the city's resurgent Midtown district and draws about 500,000 visitors a year. Van Gogh's "Self Portrait" was the first piece from the acclaimed artist acquired by an American museum, Marcil said. The city later bought "Wedding Dance" and "Gladioli" by Monet. Less ethical art collectors might be interested if DIA pieces were made available, but legitimate collectors would be appalled at the reason behind the sale, said Charles Guerin, director of the Hyde Collection in Glen Falls, N.Y. Some pieces were meant to be enjoyed by the public and "not meant to pay off debt," he said. Public opposition has sunk similar plans to sell cherished art collections. Brandeis University near Boston announced plans in 2009 to close its Rose Art Museum and sell $350 million in artwork in response to a budget crisis. But museum supporters filed a lawsuit, and the idea was dropped. "The donors to the rest of the school raised holy hell with them," said James K. Ballinger, director of the privately owned Phoenix Art Museum in Arizona. "They realized it was a much larger issue than the sale of art objects." "You've got to be unbelievably diligent here," he said. "If you look at the DIA collections, certainly those things given to the DIA would have been given to the community, so to speak."



news sours   ww.timesleader.com

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Steven Spielberg & George Lucas Predict 'Implosion' of Film Industry

/firstshowing/img7/georgelucas-stevenspielberg-tuxes-tsr.jpg
Steven Spielberg & George Lucas Predict 'Implosion' of Film Industry
With more low budget films finding their audience on VOD or streaming on Netflix rather than movie theaters, and big budget films taking over multiplexes and occasionally bombing spectacularly, the film industry is on the verge of a dramatic shift in how audiences get their big screen entertainment. Speaking at the University of Southern California yesterday, iconic filmmakers Steven Spielberg and George Lucas lamented the difficult path to get a film into movie theaters nowadays, and they both predict an implosion of the motion picture industry as we know it, mostly in how we pay for films and where we see them. Read on! As evidenced by film studios' obsession with established intellectual property over original ideas, Spielberg says that many of the ideas coming from film students at schools like USC "are too fringe-y for the movies," and that's where the real problem begins. With studios putting all their money into these big blockbusters that have the potential to lose a lot of money, something has to give. THR has Spielberg's comment: "That's the big danger, and there's eventually going to be an implosion — or a big meltdown. There's going to be an implosion where three or four or maybe even a half-dozen megabudget movies are going to go crashing into the ground, and that's going to change the paradigm." It's going to take some big time failures from movie studios to realize this business model isn't working as well as it used to. Spielberg thinks the pricing model for movies in theaters will change to reflect a film's higher or lower profile. The director thinks, "you're gonna have to pay $25 for the next Iron Man, you're probably only going to have to pay $7 to see Lincoln." In fact, Spielberg points out that his Best Picture nominated drama was extremely close to becoming an HBO film instead of a theatrical release. And it sounds like TV might be the next "big" thing for the movies. Lucas praises television, saying the medium is "much more adventurous" and he predicts, "I think eventually the Lincolns will go away and they're going to be on television." That kind of dramatic shift would mean there would have to be some kind of reworking of the Academy Awards, especially when a film like Behind the Candelabra, Steven Soderbergh's HBO film about Liberace, is getting so much critical praise and could easily be an awards contender when the Oscars come around if it had been a theatrical release. But if movies like Lincoln that aren't huge blockbusters head to TV, what happens with the big screen? The Star Wars director believes the movie theater model could revert back the Broadway play format (which is kind of how movies used to be release in theaters decades ago). Rather than movies sticking around for only a couple months, they would be in theaters longer, and the ticket prices would be higher in order to make sure a film's budget is recouped. Spielberg pointed out that E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial stayed in theaters for a year and four months. That simply doesn't happen anymore with the most recent wide release, extended theatrical run belonging to Titanic, which stayed in US theaters for about nine months. My Big Fat Greek Wedding was in theaters for nearly a year though, beginning with a limited release. It would make the most sense that the bigger movies, which costs hundreds of millions, would be the films people want to see in theaters, and might be willing to fork over some extra money. Plus, if the film is in theaters longer, with the home video release gap no longer being a mere two or three months, more people will be likely to pay to see it sooner than later. And considering how many indie releases head to VOD or Netflix for a release, Spielberg and Lucas seem to have the right idea about an extreme paradigm shift. When it comes down to it, getting a movie made and into theaters by way of a studio is extremely difficult nowadays. As Lucas points out, "We're talking Lincoln and Red Tails -- we barely got them into theaters. You're talking about Steven Spielberg and George Lucas can't get their movie into a theater." Though Red Tails may not be the greatest example, the idea is that these iconic filmmakers are having trouble getting their own movies made. Spielberg points out that he had to own half of a studio in order to get Lincoln made. The times they are a-changing, and let's just hope that Hollywood has the foresight to take action and not let the industry crumble before shaking things up. Thoughts?



news sours   www.firstshowing.net